The internet is crowded with anonymous certainty. We are building the opposite: each evidence-sensitive page names its sources, the day those sources were checked, and—only after a real review—the qualified California professional who read the page.
What the work will ask
- Read the whole page and open the sources behind its clinical claims.
- Mark what is accurate, what overreaches, and what a reader could misunderstand.
- Confirm the final revision through an authenticated submission before your name, credential type, number, and review date appear.
- Revisit time-sensitive pages on their stated evidence clock.
The first docket
The work waiting now is not a general blessing over the website. It is page-sized and specific:
- Psychedelics, ketamine, esketamine and prescribing claims.
- ADHD evaluation, OCD treatment and therapist-screening tools.
- Perinatal care, wildfire recovery and urgent-care language.
- California consent, insurance and access rules, with separate legal review where the law—not clinical judgment—controls the answer.
A review belongs to the exact words you read. If we change those words, your reviewer attribution pauses until you read the revision. Your name does not become a standing endorsement of the site. Reviewer attribution is not continuing-education, CE, or CME credit.
See every page in the first docket and open its exact discipline-specific work packet →
What this form does not do
It does not appoint you, publish your name, or claim that you reviewed anything. The page-sized scope, revision fingerprint and attestation boundary are now inspectable; assignment, payment, correspondence and authenticated-submission operations are not live. Joining the interest list does not promise an assignment or payment. People on the list will see the terms plainly before deciding whether to participate.