Urgency may be real. Before consent, ask what kind of facility is being proposed, who regulates the exact site, what treatment happens there, and how your teen returns home.
Needing more care is not a verdict on your teen or your parenting. A parent can be frightened and still ask for proof. A teen can need protection and still deserve reasons, dignity, family contact, and a voice.
Preview only. Child-and-adolescent clinical review and California access/legal review are pending for this exact revision. This page stays outside search engines and site search until both reviews and its source checks pass.
Call 911 for an overdose, serious injury, weapon in use, attempt in progress, or other immediate physical danger.
Call or text 988 when a teen may act on suicide thoughts, the safety plan no longer holds, or you cannot keep the situation safe while arranging care.
A facility record, admissions line, or waitlist is not crisis assessment.
It cannot confirm an opening, decide whether a setting is right for one young person, or turn a state licence or approval into a promise of quality or safety. Inclusion is computed from official source rows and is never purchased.
Ask the person proposing care to point to the exact words on the assessment or discharge plan. A commercial label is not a California licence category.
Twenty-four-hour inpatient assessment and stabilization when a young person needs hospital-level care.
A short, unlocked, staff-secured crisis alternative to hospitalization. California licenses a CCRP as an STRTP and requires a separate mental-health program approval.
Short-term, twenty-four-hour nonmedical care and supervision with specialty mental-health treatment after an individualized assessment supports that level.
Twenty-four-hour inpatient psychiatric services in a nonhospital setting for Medicaid-eligible people under 21.
A secured, home-like children’s mental-health setting intended to be less restrictive than a state hospital.
PHP and IOP are structured treatment while the young person lives at home. Wraparound, ICC, IHBS, TBS and FSP are community supports, not beds.
Pressure compresses them into one yes or no. Open them again. Each decision has a different owner and a different kind of proof.
Ask the treating clinician to write the exact level, what need it is meant to address, which less-restrictive alternatives were considered, and what evidence supports the decision.
One written recommendation with a named clinical owner.Separate the marketing name from the legal operator, CDSS facility licence, DHCS mental-health approval or certification, and any hospital or LPS designation.
Exact public records—not a quality score.A referral, plan authorization, county agreement, provider intake, admission decision, and open bed are different facts. Ask who owns each one and by what date.
A dated next step, not a loose list of phone numbers.Ask for the weekly treatment calendar, suicide and self-harm response, psychiatrist coverage, family contact, restraint and seclusion rules, identity affirmation, school plan, and complaint route.
Written policies and actual hours—not “evidence-based” as a slogan.Discharge criteria, step-down appointment, medication handoff, family preparation, school reentry, and the person who responds if risk rises should exist before admission.
A return-home plan with owners and dates.The current DHCS file contains 689 residential mental-health program rows statewide. This first regional slice includes every STRTP row that matches the five focus counties after surrounding whitespace is trimmed.
The row can establish: that DHCS included a named STRTP row with an application label of Approved and a value under its CERTIFICATE NUMBER column in this dated file.
It cannot establish: a current CDSS licence, age 12–17 eligibility, referral route, insurance, an admission offer, open bed, treatment quality, safety, fit, complaint history, or outcomes.
Zero STRTP rows matched Santa Clara County in this exact source file. That is a dataset result, not proof that no residential care, crisis bed, hospital care, PRTF, CTF, CCRP, or out-of-county placement route exists.
Source integrity: dataset 2026-06-30.1 was retrieved August 31, 2026. SHA-256: 1b8e4e8583e6d2c1a93d086cbf79551a27981c154de85c8e35a5363ca550e830. The ledger preserves two source defects: one Alameda value begins with a space and one Castro Valley city value contains a line break. The county is trimmed only for matching and display; the city is joined only for display.
Privacy: no analytics, advertising pixels, session recording, geolocation, form entry, or browser storage. External official sites use their own privacy practices.
Release hold: clinical and California access/legal review are pending. The next source review is scheduled September 30, 2026. No review badge is claimed.